salvar_lembrete_email_tarefa

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It states the action (create) but does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it can overwrite existing reminders, whether it requires the task to exist, or any authentication or rate limit considerations. The observation about minutes adds minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. The first sentence clearly states the purpose, and the second provides a key usage note. It is well-structured and front-loaded, with no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not mention return values (no output schema), error conditions, or side effects. For a tool with two required parameters and no annotations, it lacks important contextual details like what the user gets back (e.g., the created reminder object) and how to handle failures.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only partially explains 'minutos_antes' (minutes before) but does not describe 'tarefa_id'. This leaves a parameter unaddressed, and the explanation for the other is minimal.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates an email reminder for a task ('Criar um lembrete de email para uma tarefa'). This is a specific verb+resource pairing that distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'buscar_lembretes_email_tarefa' (search) and 'salvar_tarefa' (save task). However, it could be more explicit about the uniqueness of creation versus update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'Observações' note instructs the user to provide the number of minutes before the task, which gives some usage context. However, it lacks guidance on when not to use this tool (e.g., if a reminder already exists) or alternatives like 'buscar_lembretes_email_tarefa' for checking existing reminders. No prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.