excluir_familia_produto

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It does not specify if deletion is permanent, whether there are cascade effects on child entities, or the authorization level required. The description only states the action without any context on implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is efficient in length. However, it severely under-specifies the tool's behavior and parameters. It earns a 3 because while it is short, it does not waste words, but it fails to provide necessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one required parameter, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It provides the basic purpose but lacks usage context, behavioral disclosure, and parameter elaboration. For a delete operation, the agent would need to know if the operation is reversible or has side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage for the single parameter 'id_familia'. The parameter is required but the description offers no additional meaning about its format, source, or constraints. The agent has to infer from the parameter name and title alone, which is insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Excluir' = delete) and the resource ('familia de produto' = product family) within the context of 'Ploomes CRM'. It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like excluir_peca_produto (delete product part) and excluir_cliente (delete client).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor any prerequisites or constraints. For example, it does not mention whether a product family can be deleted if it has associated products, nor what the required input format for the family ID is.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.