buscar_acoes_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility. It fails to disclose behavioral traits like read-only nature, authentication requirements, or potential errors. The description is minimal and does not add beyond the basic purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, using two sentences plus bullet points. It is front-loaded with the main action and efficiently conveys the use case without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and minimal annotation context, the description should clarify what the tool returns (e.g., list of actions, fields). It only mentions the use case but omits output details, pagination behavior, and error handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage for the only parameter 'pagina', and the description does not mention this parameter at all. It adds no meaning beyond the schema, leaving the parameter's purpose and format unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for available actions for webhooks, specifying the verb 'buscar' and resource 'acoes para webhooks'. It also notes the use case of obtaining ActionId for creating/updating webhooks, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'buscar_webhooks'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly instructs to use this tool to obtain the ActionId when creating or updating webhooks, providing clear context. However, it lacks guidance on when not to use it or mentions of alternatives among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.