buscar_horarios_disponiveis

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions the 7-day range constraint but lacks details on whether the tool is read-only, required permissions, error handling, or return format. The description adds some useful context but is insufficient for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, using three short sections with emoji headers. Each sentence serves a purpose: objective, prerequisites, and observations. No unnecessary words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 6 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It covers the purpose and one constraint but omits parameter details, return values, error cases, and the meaning of 'available times' in the context of the system.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, yet the description only indirectly clarifies 'usuarios_ids' and 'equipe_id' via prerequisites. Other parameters like 'duracao_em_minutos' and 'incluir_usuario_logado' are not explained. The description fails to compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Buscar horários disponíveis em um período de tempo' (search for available times in a period). The verb 'buscar' and resource 'horários disponíveis' are specific and distinct from siblings, which focus on CRUD operations on other entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides prerequisites, instructing the agent to call 'buscar_usuario' and 'buscar_equipes_de_usuarios' when user or team IDs are needed. It also notes the maximum 7-day range. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.