excluir_tarefa

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It fails to disclose any behavioral traits: it does not confirm the destructive nature, permissions needed, side effects, or reversibility. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the prerequisite.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line), but it is underspecified rather than concise. It does not earn its place because it omits the core purpose and other essential information. A concise description should be both brief and complete.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is severely incomplete. It does not state the action, return value, or side effects. The prerequisite alone is insufficient for the agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not add any meaning to the parameter 'id_tarefa'. It only mentions that the ID should be obtained, without explaining its format or role. The description fails to compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description does not explicitly state that the tool deletes a task. It only gives a prerequisite ('Busque o ID da tarefa a ser excluída'), leaving the purpose implied by the name 'excluir_tarefa'. This is insufficient for a clear purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when or when not to use this tool. The description only instructs to fetch the ID first, which is a prerequisite, not usage context. No alternatives are mentioned, such as other exclusion tools or 'finalizar_tarefa'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.