Update Document Title

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that it updates two separate elements (sidebar title and internal page block title), which adds transparency. However, it does not mention permission requirements, potential side effects, or whether the operation is reversible. Given no annotations, the description carries the full burden but omits some important behavioral details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that conveys all necessary information without any superfluous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the core effect of the tool, but given the lack of an output schema and annotations, it could be more complete by addressing return values, error cases, or prerequisites. For a simple rename, it is adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds value by explaining that the title update affects both metadata and content, which is not in the schema. However, workspaceId lacks a description in both schema and description. Schema coverage is 67%, and the description partially compensates by clarifying the update scope.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Rename a document') and the specific resource (document title). It further distinguishes by explaining that it updates both the sidebar title and internal page block title, which differentiates it from other tools that might only update one aspect.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus similar siblings like move_doc or rename_folder. The description does not mention use cases, prerequisites, or alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.