Inspect Template Structure

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool inspects structure, tags, and fallback risk, but does not mention side effects, permissions, rate limits, or whether it is read-only. The name 'inspect' implies safety, but the description should explicitly state non-destructive behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that conveys all necessary information without redundancy. Every word adds value, making it efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description covers the core purpose. However, it lacks information about return format or expected output, which is important for an inspection tool. It is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 50% with one parameter undocumented. The description adds general context about what is inspected but does not clarify the role of workspaceId or provide format details. It fails to compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Inspect' and the resource 'template doc', specifying what aspects are inspected: native structure, tags, and fallback risk. It also provides context 'before instantiation', which distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'instantiate_template_native'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context by saying 'before instantiation', but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention when not to use it. Sibling tools like 'instantiate_template_native' are related, but no guidance on selection is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.