Create Tag
create_tagCreate a reusable tag to categorize and organize documents within a workspace.
Instructions
Create a workspace-level tag entry for future reuse.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspaceId | No | ||
| tag | Yes | Tag name |
create_tagCreate a reusable tag to categorize and organize documents within a workspace.
Create a workspace-level tag entry for future reuse.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspaceId | No | ||
| tag | Yes | Tag name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It indicates a write operation but fails to mention idempotency, error handling, or what happens if the tag already exists. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundant words. Every part contributes meaning.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given two parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimal. It lacks details on return values, error conditions, or default behavior. Adequate but with clear gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 50% with only 'tag' described. The description adds 'workspace-level' context but does not explain 'workspaceId' parameter. Partial compensation for low schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's action ('create'), resource ('workspace-level tag entry'), and intention ('for future reuse'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'add_tag_to_doc' and 'list_tags'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies the tag is for reuse but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it provide prerequisites or exclusions. The context is clear but lacks explicit guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DAWNCR0W/affine-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server