ue_destroy_actor
Remove a specific actor from the current level by providing its outliner label.
Instructions
Delete the actor with the given outliner label from the open level.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| label | Yes |
Remove a specific actor from the current level by providing its outliner label.
Delete the actor with the given outliner label from the open level.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| label | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'Delete' without disclosing behavioral details like permanence, authorization needs, or effects on other actors.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that communicates the essential purpose without unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple destructive tool with one parameter, the description is adequate but lacks details on error handling, return values, or prerequisites like the level being open.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description clarifies that the 'label' parameter refers to the 'outliner label', adding meaning beyond the schema. However, no format or constraints are provided, and schema coverage is 0%.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Delete), the resource (actor), and the context (from the open level). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like ue_spawn_actor or ue_list_actors.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The description only implies usage for deletion without additional context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ATDev-Inc/uemcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server