mcp_opendaw_set_groove_shuffle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description explains parameter range and typical values but does not disclose behavioral traits like whether change is global, involves any destructive action, or requires specific permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, no redundant information. Parameter detail follows directly after action statement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter setter, the description covers action and parameter adequately. No output schema, but not necessary. Minor gap: does not specify scope (project-wide).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% coverage; description adds significant value by explaining amount range (0.0-1.0) and giving typical values (light, moderate, strong triplet). Compensates for schema gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states set groove/shuffle amount for project. Verb and resource identified. Does not explicitly distinguish from sibling 'apply_swing' but implies project-level setting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No mention of prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.