mcp_opendaw_create_chord_progression

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description lacks disclosure of side effects, idempotency, or performance. Only mentions return value, not behavioral traits like whether it is destructive or requires specific permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured: purpose statement, then parameter details. Slightly verbose but each sentence adds value. Example and lists are clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, parameters, and return value. Mentions output format briefly. Given no annotations and an output schema exists, the description is sufficiently complete for this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Detailed explanation of all parameters with valid values, examples, and defaults. Compensates for 0% schema coverage by providing full semantic context for 'chords', 'start_beat', 'unit_index', 'track_index', and 'chord_duration'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb+resource: 'Create a chord progression from chord names'. Distinguishes from siblings by emphasizing efficiency: 'one call instead of 15-50 note creations'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the batch advantage over individual note creation. Provides context for when to use, though no direct exclusion or alternative mention beyond the implicit alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.