Skip to main content
Glama

mcp_opendaw_create_section_transition

Combine filter sweeps, volume fades, mute automation, and impacts into a single coordinated transition from one section to another, replacing multiple individual calls.

Instructions

Create a complete section transition in one call — combines multiple automation tools.

The most common arrangement technique: moving from one section to another (verse→chorus, breakdown→drop, intro→main). Each preset combines filter sweeps, volume fades, mute automation, and impacts into a single coordinated transition. Replaces 3-5 individual calls.

transition_type: One of: "drop" — Breakdown→drop: filter close on synths, drums muted, then filter open + unmute + impact "buildup" — Verse→chorus: filter open on lead, volume fade in on pads, snare roll implied "breakdown" — Main→breakdown: filter close on drums, volume fade out on bass, mute synths "intro" — Silence→intro: volume fade in on all, filter open on pads "outro" — Main→outro: volume fade out on all, filter close on lead start_beat: Transition start position in beats. duration_beats: Total transition length in beats (default 16 = 4 bars). unit_indices: Comma-separated AU indices. Convention: drums=0, bass=1, lead/synth=2, pads=3. Adjust to match your arrangement. Default "0,1,2,3".

Returns summary of all automation created across units.

Examples: create_section_transition("drop", start_beat=32, duration_beats=16) → 32-48: filter close on synth, drums muted at 32, filter open at 44, unmute+impact at 48 create_section_transition("intro", start_beat=0, duration_beats=8) → 0-8: volume fade in on all, filter open on pads

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
start_beatNo
unit_indicesNo0,1,2,3
duration_beatsNo
transition_typeYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, the description details what each transition type does (filter sweeps, volume fades, mute automation, impacts). Mentions return value (summary of automation). Does not mention if it overwrites existing automation, which would be useful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively long but well-structured with header, parameter list, and examples. Every sentence adds value. Could be slightly more concise, but the detail is justified for a complex composite tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity, annotations missing, and output schema present, the description covers purpose, all parameters, examples, and return value. It lacks error conditions or prerequisites (e.g., must have sections), but overall quite complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description fully documents all parameters: transition_type with all options, start_beat, duration_beats, unit_indices with conventions. The description fully compensates for missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a complete section transition combining multiple automation tools. It distinguishes from sibling tools by noting it replaces 3-5 individual calls. Each transition type is described with specific effects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states it's for moving between sections (verse->chorus, etc.) and that it replaces multiple calls. Provides examples but does not explicitly state when not to use it. Context is clear enough for an agent to decide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AMEOBIUS-team/opendaw-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server