mcp_opendaw_remove_midi_effect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the basic operation. It does not disclose side effects, destructiveness, or what happens to the MIDI chain after removal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: one functional sentence and two lines listing parameters. It is front-loaded, though the parameter listing is slightly redundant with the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 2 required parameters, both explained, but lacks information about the return value (output schema exists but not shown), prerequisites, and the fact that it is a destructive operation. It would benefit from cross-referencing sibling tools for obtaining indices.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds meaningful explanations: 'Audio unit index' and 'MIDI effect position to remove (0-based)', which clarify the integer parameters beyond the schema's minimal titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Remove', the resource 'MIDI effect', and the context 'from an audio unit's MIDI chain'. It differentiates itself from sibling tools like 'remove_effect' and 'add_midi_effect'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., replace_effect or add_midi_effect), nor does it mention prerequisites like obtaining unit_index and effect_index.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.