Skip to main content
Glama

article_get

Read-only

Fetch article metadata, citations, and sections by PMID, PMCID, or DOI, with fast auto-fallback or full provider coverage.

Instructions

Get article by PMID/PMCID/DOI. Citation: fast mode (~4s, auto-fallback to PubMed) or full mode (~15-30s, all 5 providers). Provider coverage depends on ID type.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesArticle identifier: PMID (numeric, e.g. "12345"), PMCID (e.g. "PMC1234567"), or DOI (e.g. "10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2")
sectionsNoSections to include. Use ["citation"] for citation data, ["all"] for everything.
limitNoMaximum items per section (e.g., 20 citations)
citation_modeNoFast: Europe PMC, Semantic Scholar, Crossref (~4s). Full: All 5 providers (~15-30s). Fast mode auto-falls back to PubMed when other providers return no items.fast
citation_directionNoCitation direction: "forward" (articles citing this one), "backward" (references), "both" (default)both
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds context beyond annotations: fast mode auto-fallback to PubMed and provider coverage dependency on ID type. No contradiction with readOnlyHint or openWorldHint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences contain all essential information without redundancy; key details are front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers core use cases and parameter behavior; lacks output schema but return values are implicitly understood (article data).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds practical context (time estimates, fallback behavior) that enhances understanding beyond schema enum values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves articles by identifier types (PMID, PMCID, DOI), distinguishing it from search-focused siblings like article_search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains when to use fast vs full mode and mentions citation direction, but does not explicitly contrast with alternative tools for similar tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yeyuan98/biomcp-ts'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server