Skip to main content
Glama
shanewiseman

paperclip-mcp

by shanewiseman

Lock an issue document

pc_post_issues_by_id_documents_by_key_lock

Lock a specific document linked to an issue, preventing edits until unlocked.

Instructions

Lock an issue document

Paperclip operation: POST /api/issues/{id}/documents/{key}/lock. Authorization class: board_or_agent.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyNoOptional JSON compatibility payload. The source OpenAPI operation does not declare a request schema.
pathYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes
headersYes
encodingYes
status_codeYes
content_typeYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate it's a write operation, not idempotent, and not destructive. The description adds the HTTP method (POST) and authorization class (board_or_agent), but does not explain side effects like preventing edits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise but has redundant first sentence. It lacks structure but includes essential HTTP path and auth info.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and presence of output schema, the description still misses important context about what locking entails and when to use it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 50% and the description adds no parameter information. The path parameters 'id' and 'key' lack descriptions, and the optional body parameter is not explained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Lock' and the resource 'issue document', which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like unlock.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the unlock tool. No prerequisites or context for usage are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shanewiseman/paperclip-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server