Create a project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide key behavioral hints (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, etc.). The description adds authorization class info ('board_or_agent') and the HTTP method, but does not elaborate on side effects, rate limits, or other behavioral details beyond what is in annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (two sentences) but at the cost of missing critical information. It is front-loaded with the purpose, but the brevity leaves significant gaps. It could be expanded without becoming overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (nested objects, required fields, output schema), the description is highly incomplete. It fails to mention the output, required parameters, or any nuances of the creation process. The description alone would not enable an AI agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema is complex with many nested objects, but the description provides zero information about parameters. There is no explanation of required fields like 'name' or 'path.companyId', nor any guidance on how to structure the body. Schema description coverage is 0%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a project', which is a specific verb and resource. Among the many sibling tools, this is the only one for creating a project, making it easily distinguishable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus alternatives like pc_patch_projects_by_id or pc_get_projects_by_id. Lacks any context on prerequisites or recommended conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.