Update a routine trigger

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate write operation, not destructive, not idempotent. Description adds little beyond the HTTP method and auth class. Missing details like partial update behavior, side effects, or response structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but repeats the title. It could be more concise by removing redundancy and adding value. However, it is not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With complex nested parameters, no schema descriptions, and an output schema present but not described, the description is deficient. It does not cover what the tool does beyond the bare minimum.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description provides zero information about parameters. It does not explain any field meanings, constraints, or usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update a routine trigger' which clearly indicates the verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like pc_post_routines_by_id_triggers (create) or pc_delete_routine_triggers_by_id (delete).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no context. It only mentions authorization class and HTTP method.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.