Skip to main content
Glama
shanewiseman

paperclip-mcp

by shanewiseman

Create a label

pc_post_companies_by_company_id_labels

Create a label for a company by providing a name and a hex color code. Requires board or agent authorization.

Instructions

Create a label

Paperclip operation: POST /api/companies/{companyId}/labels. Authorization class: board_or_agent.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes
pathYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes
headersYes
encodingYes
status_codeYes
content_typeYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the description adds only the authorization class. This is useful but minimal. No details on potential side effects or behavior beyond creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two sentences, no fluff. It front-loads the purpose and includes relevant endpoint and auth info. Could be slightly more informative without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Even with an output schema, the description lacks completeness: no input parameter explanations, no info about label uniqueness, color validation, or outcome. For a simple creation tool, it is minimally adequate but leaves many gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any parameter meaning. It fails to compensate for the lack of schema descriptions, leaving the agent without guidance on what 'name' and 'color' represent or constraints beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and description clearly state 'Create a label', which is a specific verb-resource pair. Among siblings, there are get and delete label tools, so creating is distinct. The description concisely conveys the action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides the HTTP method and authorization class but gives no guidance on when to create a label versus using other label operations (get, delete). No context on prerequisites or when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shanewiseman/paperclip-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server