Get the active customImage template and setup status for an environment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the HTTP method, endpoint path, and authorization class, which are useful beyond the annotations. However, it does not explain behavior when no template exists or error conditions. Annotations already indicate read-only and non-destructive nature, so the description adds some but limited value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two sentences) and front-loaded with the main purpose. It is concise, though the second sentence is a technical detail that could be integrated. No redundant text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema, the description does not need to fully document return values, but it fails to explain the input parameters or provide context on the setup status and template. It lacks completeness for a tool with zero schema description coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the meaning or format of any parameter (environmentId, companyId). It relies entirely on the schema, which lacks descriptions. This severely hinders correct parameter usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the active custom image template and setup status for an environment, providing a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from other custom image tools (e.g., POST or DELETE), which slightly reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus other custom image tools or alternatives. The description only states the action, not the context or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.