Update agent instructions path

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-idempotent and non-destructive nature. Description adds auth class 'board_or_agent', which is useful. However, does not disclose that path can be set to null or whether the update is partial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very short, two sentences. The second sentence on HTTP method and auth class is arguably not essential but does not waste much space. Could be improved by replacing with parameter context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with nested parameters and no schema descriptions, the description is insufficient. Missing parameter explanations and usage context, though an output schema exists (not shown).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description must explain parameters. It fails to describe body.path, adapterConfigKey, or path.id, leaving the agent to infer from the schema structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and first sentence 'Update agent instructions path' clearly state the action and resource. However, no distinction from sibling tools like pc_patch_agents_by_id_instructions_bundle, which could cause confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no mention of expected effect. Only technical details (HTTP method, auth class) are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.