Skip to main content
Glama
shanewiseman

paperclip-mcp

by shanewiseman

Delete an agent API key

pc_delete_agents_by_id_keys_by_key_id
DestructiveIdempotent

Delete a specific API key for an agent by providing the agent ID and key ID.

Instructions

Delete an agent API key

Paperclip operation: DELETE /api/agents/{id}/keys/{keyId}. Authorization class: board_or_agent.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyNoOptional JSON compatibility payload. The source OpenAPI operation does not declare a request schema.
pathYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes
headersYes
encodingYes
status_codeYes
content_typeYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool as destructive (destructiveHint=true). The description adds that it is a DELETE operation and mentions the authorization class ('board_or_agent'), providing some behavioral context beyond annotations. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (two sentences) and front-loaded with the purpose. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity, missing important details about parameters and usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not mention what the tool returns. Required parameters (id, keyId) are not explained. For a destructive operation, more context on authorization and consequences is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%, but the description does not explain the parameters (id, keyId) or their roles. It only indirectly hints via the URL path. The body parameter description is vague. The description fails to compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and description clearly state the action ('Delete') and resource ('an agent API key'). The purpose is unambiguous and distinguishes from other agent-related tools by specifying the deletion of an API key by key ID.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidelines provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The description only states the operation without helping the agent decide when to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shanewiseman/paperclip-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server