Create my user secret value

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read/write and non-destructive nature. The description only adds 'Authorization class: board', which is minimally informative. It does not clarify behavior on duplicate creation or other side effects, so little value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (two sentences) but lacks essential detail. It is concise but at the expense of completeness, making it insufficiently informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema and two complex parameters (nested objects), the description fails to describe inputs, usage context, or behavioral details. It is incomplete for effective tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must explain parameters but does not. No info about 'value', 'definitionId', 'companyId', or other fields is provided, leaving the agent unable to understand their meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a user secret value for the current user, using the HTTP method and path. The title and description together convey the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get, patch, and delete. However, it could be more explicit about what a 'user secret value' is.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, such as having a user secret definition, nor does it explain differences from similar operations like patching or deleting.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.