Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Every schema parameter (x, y, z, length, width, height, face_x, face_y, face_z) gets a one-line semantic explanation, such as 'length: Box length along X', fully compensating for the 0% schema description coverage. One deduction: the description also lists a 'controller' argument not present in the input schema, which could confuse an agent about invocation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.