List IT Glue Organizations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds value by noting pagination, summary fields on list items, and case-insensitive partial name matching, which go beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, no filler, essential information front-loaded. Every sentence adds value: purpose, usage context, filtering behavior, pagination, and pointer to full record tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (despite not shown), the description adequately covers pagination, filtering, and relational context. No gaps identified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds meaningful details: filter_name matches partially and case-insensitively, filter_id is exact, and sort prefix '-' indicates descending. This enriches parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Search and list IT Glue organizations.' It also specifies its role as a prerequisite for other tools (finding organization ID), distinguishing it from siblings like itglue_get_organization.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises using this tool first to obtain organization IDs needed by document and flexible-asset tools, providing clear usage context. It does not explicitly exclude other list tools but indirectly guides when to use get_organization for full records.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.