List IT Glue Flexible Assets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only and idempotent. Description adds that returned items are previews with truncated/stripped values, and directs to get for full data. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. Each sentence adds value: purpose and optional restriction, then required ID and sibling tool reference, then preview behavior and alternative for full values.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With annotations and output schema, description covers purpose, key limitation (previews), and how to get more detail. Lacks mention of pagination or error cases, but sufficient for a list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameter details. Description adds context about the type ID relationship but does not elaborate on page_size, response_format, or organization_id beyond schema defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'list flexible assets of a given type' with optional organization filter. Distinguishes from itglue_get_flexible_asset (full values) and directs to itglue_list_flexible_asset_types for type IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use this tool (list by type) and when to use alternatives (get for full values). Mentions required type ID and how to find it, but does not explicitly state when not to use (e.g., for filtering by something else).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.