Create IT Glue Document

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate write operation (readOnlyHint=false). The description adds that the document is created as a draft, implying it is not visible until published. This provides useful behavioral context beyond annotations, and there is no contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no fluff. The first sentence states the action and state, the second supplies next steps. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's role as the first step in a multi-step creation process, the description covers the essentials: what it does, required parameters, and follow-up tools. No output schema exists, so return value details are not expected. The workflow reference to sibling tools adds completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all four parameters. The description adds minimal additional meaning (e.g., 'in an organization' for organization_id). Baseline score of 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new document as a DRAFT in an organization.' This is a specific verb (create) and resource (document) with a defined state (draft). It distinguishes from siblings like itglue_create_document_section (adds content) and itglue_publish_document (makes visible).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a workflow: create draft, then add content with itglue_create_document_section, then publish with itglue_publish_document. This gives clear context on when to use this tool and what steps follow. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.