get_rule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states 'Get details'. It does not explicitly confirm a read-only operation, mention potential permissions needed, or indicate whether the tool has any side effects or quotas. For a simple get, this is somewhat acceptable but still lacks proactive disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and front-loaded with the key verb and resource. No redundancy. Could be slightly expanded to add value without losing conciseness, but currently it is minimal and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, yet the description does not indicate what the tool returns (e.g., rule object with all fields). It also does not explain what constitutes an 'automated rule' in this system. The lack of return information makes the description incomplete for a tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters described. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema labels ('Rule ID', 'Comma-separated fields to return'). Baseline of 3 applies; however, the description could have clarified valid fields or format but did not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves details of a specific automated rule. This verb+resource pairing distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_rules (list all) and create_rule (create), making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_rules for summaries or update_rule for modifications. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, scenarios, or companion tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.