get_lead_form

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only says 'Get details', implying a safe read, but does not disclose behavioral traits like authentication requirements, rate limits, or error handling. This is minimal transparency for a read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler. Every word serves a purpose, making it appropriately concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool lacks an output schema, yet the description does not hint at the return structure (e.g., full form object, specific fields). For a simple get operation, more context is needed, especially to distinguish from sibling tools like 'get_lead' (which returns a single lead) or 'get_form_leads' (returns leads).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes both parameters: 'form_id' as 'Lead form ID' and 'fields' as 'Comma-separated fields to return'. Since schema coverage is 100%, the description adds no additional meaning. Score is baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get details of a specific lead generation form' with a verb+resource pattern. It effectively distinguishes from siblings like 'list_lead_forms' (listing all forms) and 'create_lead_form' (creating forms). However, it does not specify what 'details' entails, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context or exclusions, such as preferring 'list_lead_forms' for overviews or 'get_form_leads' for form submissions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.