Skip to main content
Glama

Toggle Track Visibility

toggle_track_visibility

Show or hide a video track by setting Premiere's track mute state (eye icon) and reading it back, so you can control which tracks appear in the active sequence.

Instructions

Set video track visibility using Premiere's track mute state (eye icon) and read the mute state back. Premiere's scripting API exposes mute, not a separate video visibility setter.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "track_index": "<track_index>",
      "visible": "<visible>"
    },
    "name": "toggle_track_visibility"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
visibleYesTrue to show, false to hide
track_indexYesVideo track index (0-based)
idempotency_keyNoOptional client-chosen key (1-128 chars of A-Z a-z 0-9 . _ : -) for this intended edit. Pass a fresh key per edit and reuse it only when retrying that same edit, for example after a client-side timeout. A repeat with the same tool, key and arguments is not run again: while the first call is running it fails with IDEMPOTENCY_IN_PROGRESS (poll get_last_operations); after it finished it returns the original outcome marked replayed. A definite failure with nothing applied (receipt outcome not_applied) may be retried with the same key. Reusing a key with different arguments fails with IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED. Scoped to this MCP session (the stdio server process, or the HTTP server process when Streamable HTTP is stateless per request) and held in memory only (200 keys, 1 hour); it does not survive a restart or reconnect. Read-only invocations are never deduplicated.
expected_cep_targetNoOptional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.
expected_project_pathNoOptional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.
receiptNoVersioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.
idempotencyNoPresent when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.30.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds real behavioral context beyond the annotations: the underlying mute/eye-icon model and the fact that state is read back. It does not contradict readOnlyHint=false or destructiveHint=false. However, it says nothing about whether the change is applied to the target sequence, what happens if the track index is out of range, or how it interacts with the idempotency/guard parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, mechanism stated first, zero filler. Every clause contributes either purpose or rationale.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a five-parameter, nested-object tool: the schema and output schema carry the guard/idempotency and return details, so the description need not repeat them. What is missing is any differentiation from mute_track and set_track_states, which matters for a tool whose name suggests overlapping behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description explains the conceptual mapping behind the visible parameter (visibility == mute) and the 0-based video track, which a reader cannot fully infer from the schema alone. That added semantic meaning earns a notch above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource -- setting video track visibility -- and uniquely explains that this is implemented through Premiere's track mute state (eye icon). It does not distinguish itself from the close sibling mute_track, and the name says 'toggle' while the behavior is a required explicit boolean set, which is a mild mismatch.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus mute_track or set_track_states, which appear to overlap. The only usage-adjacent sentence is a note on why the tool exists (API exposes mute only), not a when-to-use or when-not-to-use rule.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools