Skip to main content
Glama

Set Sequence Audio Settings

set_sequence_audio_settings

Change the active sequence audio sample rate and channel type (mono, stereo, 5.1, multichannel) to match your delivery specs before export or mixdown.

Instructions

Change audio settings of the active sequence (sample rate, channel type).

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "set_sequence_audio_settings"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sample_rateNoAudio sample rate (e.g., 44100, 48000, 96000)
channel_typeNoChannel type: 0=Mono, 1=Stereo, 2=5.1, 3=Multichannel
idempotency_keyNoOptional client-chosen key (1-128 chars of A-Z a-z 0-9 . _ : -) for this intended edit. Pass a fresh key per edit and reuse it only when retrying that same edit, for example after a client-side timeout. A repeat with the same tool, key and arguments is not run again: while the first call is running it fails with IDEMPOTENCY_IN_PROGRESS (poll get_last_operations); after it finished it returns the original outcome marked replayed. A definite failure with nothing applied (receipt outcome not_applied) may be retried with the same key. Reusing a key with different arguments fails with IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED. Scoped to this MCP session (the stdio server process, or the HTTP server process when Streamable HTTP is stateless per request) and held in memory only (200 keys, 1 hour); it does not survive a restart or reconnect. Read-only invocations are never deduplicated.
expected_cep_targetNoOptional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.
expected_project_pathNoOptional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.
receiptNoVersioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.
idempotencyNoPresent when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.30.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the description only needs to add context. It does not say whether the active sequence must be open, whether an existing sample-rate change is disruptive or reversible, or how idempotency keys interact with this mutation — all beyond what the annotations state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence naming the action, target, and affected settings with no filler. Everything it says earns its place, even if it says little.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and the nested guard/idempotency parameters are exhaustively documented in the schema, so the description needn't repeat them. Still, for a mutation with four identity-guard parameters and an idempotency contract, the complete absence of any statement about preconditions or side effects leaves a gap relative to the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so sample_rate value examples and the channel_type enum mapping are already fully documented. The description adds only the names of those two settings and says nothing about the guard parameters (expected_cep_target, expected_project_path) or the idempotency key, which is the correct baseline when the schema carries the burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Change audio settings of the active sequence') and enumerates the two mutable fields, sample rate and channel type. It is clear what the tool does, but it does not distinguish itself from the nearby 'set_sequence_settings' sibling, so an agent must guess which setter covers audio rate/channels.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The mention of 'active sequence' implies a precondition, but there is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or pointer to the alternative setter or to 'get_sequence_settings' for inspecting current values. An agent gets no routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools