Skip to main content
Glama

Set Project Scratch Disk

set_project_scratch_disk

Set all four Premiere Pro scratch-disk paths for captured video, captured audio, video previews, and audio previews in one call; each path must be an existing folder or SameAsProject.

Instructions

Set the project's scratch disks for captured video, captured audio, video previews and audio previews in one call. Each path must be an existing folder or "SameAsProject"; any rejected path fails the call.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "set_project_scratch_disk"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
audio_previewsNoPath for audio previews
captured_audioNoPath for captured audio
captured_videoNoPath for captured video
video_previewsNoPath for video previews
idempotency_keyNoOptional client-chosen key (1-128 chars of A-Z a-z 0-9 . _ : -) for this intended edit. Pass a fresh key per edit and reuse it only when retrying that same edit, for example after a client-side timeout. A repeat with the same tool, key and arguments is not run again: while the first call is running it fails with IDEMPOTENCY_IN_PROGRESS (poll get_last_operations); after it finished it returns the original outcome marked replayed. A definite failure with nothing applied (receipt outcome not_applied) may be retried with the same key. Reusing a key with different arguments fails with IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED. Scoped to this MCP session (the stdio server process, or the HTTP server process when Streamable HTTP is stateless per request) and held in memory only (200 keys, 1 hour); it does not survive a restart or reconnect. Read-only invocations are never deduplicated.
save_and_verifyNoSave the project afterwards and confirm the saved scratch-disk settings (default: false). Premiere has no scratch-disk getter, so without this the result is unverified.
expected_cep_targetNoOptional reviewed CEP sequence/clip identity and exact tick ranges. Checked before every generated command; UXP refuses this CEP-only guard.
expected_project_pathNoOptional absolute saved-project path. Every generated CEP command refuses before its body when the active project differs or is unsaved. UXP commands refuse this CEP-only guard; local-only tools do not inspect Premiere. Omit to keep existing behavior.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool completed successfully.
dataNoTool-specific result data when ok is true; on failure, diagnostic detail when the tool provides it.
toolYesThe registered MCP tool name.
errorNoFailure detail when ok is false.
receiptNoVersioned common mutation receipt; success never implies rendered verification.
idempotencyNoPresent when idempotency_key deduplicated this call: replayed is true when the original outcome was returned instead of running again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.30.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare a non-read-only, non-destructive mutation, and the description adds real behavioral detail beyond them: the accepted value domain (existing folder or 'SameAsProject') and all-or-nothing failure semantics ('any rejected path fails the call'). It does not mention that save_and_verify is required to confirm results, but the schema covers that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with the scope stated first and the validation constraint second; nothing is redundant. It is efficient, though it could front-load the atomicity consequence even more clearly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be explained, and the idempotency/guard parameters are fully described in the schema. For a mutation tool with 8 parameters and nested guard objects, the description covers the essential call semantics, missing only explicit guidance on choosing among sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is already documented; the description only adds the shared value constraint (existing folder or 'SameAsProject') and the atomic failure rule. Helpful but marginal over the schema baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

A specific verb plus resource: sets all four scratch-disk paths (captured video/audio, video/audio previews) in a single call. The 'in one call' phrasing implicitly distinguishes it from the single-path sibling set_scratch_disk_path, though it never names an alternative explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the batch framing, but there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance and no pointer to set_scratch_disk_path (single path) or get_project_scratch_disks (read current values) as alternatives. An agent must infer the choice from sibling names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools