sort_pages

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not explain whether the sort is destructive, what happens to existing page order, or if it affects pages outside the current context. The operation is implied but not explicitly defined.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise at 6 words, front-loading the action and options. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity. Still efficient for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description does not cover return values, side effects, or scope. For a tool with parameters and implied state change, the description lacks necessary completeness for an AI agent to use it reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The tool description adds minimal new information beyond 'alphabetically or by custom order' which maps to the enum. Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool sorts pages alphabetically or by custom order. It uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like 'reorder_node' which reorder nodes within a page, not pages themselves. However, it does not specify the scope of pages (all pages in document or selection).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'reorder_node' or 'rename_page'. No prerequisites, use cases, or exclusions provided. For custom order, the description does not mention that page IDs must be provided, leaving the agent to infer from the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.