create_section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It says 'design-intelligent' but doesn't explain what that entails. There is no mention of side effects, permissions, or whether the operation is destructive. The description lacks sufficient transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the essential purpose without unnecessary words. It is concise and front-loaded, fitting the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and 6 parameters (including nested objects), the description is too brief. It does not explain what the tool returns, how 'design-intelligent' works, or the role of optional parameters like 'brandColor', 'mode', 'width', and 'parentId'. The description leaves significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description lists valid section types, which mirrors the schema's enum description. For 'content', it provides a brief structure hint, but the schema already has the same information. No additional meaning is added beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a design-intelligent page section' and enumerates specific section types (hero, features, etc.), making the tool's purpose unmistakable. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'create_header' or 'create_footer' which target individual components.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For instance, it doesn't clarify when to use 'create_section' instead of 'create_header' or 'create_footer'. No use cases or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.