create_new_page
Create a new page in your Figma document by specifying its name.
Instructions
Create a new page in the document.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Page name |
Create a new page in your Figma document by specifying its name.
Create a new page in the document.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Page name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the basic action. No details about permissions, side effects, or behavior like whether it returns the created page object. This is minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise at 8 words with no wasted content. The key information is front-loaded in a single sentence.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple parameterless tool? Actually it has one param. The description is adequate but could mention return value or effect. Given no output schema, it leaves some gaps, but overall minimally complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the parameter name and schema description, so it neither improves nor detracts.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('new page') and scope ('in the document'). However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'create_page' which has the same description, creating ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_page', 'duplicate_page', or other creation tools. The description provides no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lama-assaf/conductor-figma'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server