export_design_specs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'generate design specifications document' without disclosing important behavioral traits such as output format, file generation, permissions needed, or side effects. No annotations exist to compensate, leaving the agent uninformed about how the tool behaves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no wasted words. However, it lacks structure and depth, sacrificing completeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's 2 parameters and lack of output schema or annotations, the description is too minimal. It does not explain the document content, how it is returned, or how it differs from sibling tools like create_spec_sheet, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's param descriptions. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already adequately documents the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates design specifications documents for developer handoff, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like export assets or create tokens by specifying the output type and purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like other export tools or create_spec_sheet. The description implies a use case (developer handoff) but lacks explicit when-not or comparative context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.