Skip to main content
Glama
lama-assaf

conductor-figma

by lama-assaf

create_icon

Creates a UI icon from a built-in set with customizable size and color.

Instructions

Create a common UI icon from built-in set.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
iconYesIcon name: arrow-right, arrow-left, arrow-up, arrow-down, check, x, plus, minus, search, menu, settings, user, heart, star, home, mail, phone, calendar, clock, bell, lock, unlock, eye, eye-off, edit, trash, download, upload, link, external-link, copy, share, filter, sort, grid, list, chevron-right, chevron-left, chevron-down, chevron-up
sizeNoIcon size (default: 24)
colorNoColor
parentIdNoParent node ID
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must carry burden. It only states basic purpose, not behavioral traits like what happens on invalid icon name, whether it requires parent, or if it is destructive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, zero waste, front-loaded with action verb. Highly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Low complexity tool but missing return value description (no output schema). Agent doesn't know what the tool returns (e.g., node ID). Also no safety or usage context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 applies. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema; the icon parameter already lists valid values, and other parameters are generic.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a common UI icon from built-in set' clearly states a specific action and resource, distinguishing it from sibling creation tools like create_rectangle or create_svg_node.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., create_svg_node for custom icons). Does not mention prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lama-assaf/conductor-figma'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server