create_table_frame

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses that it creates a table with structural elements (headers, rows, spacing). No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Minimal behavioral detail: does not mention mutation, authorization needs, or effects on existing nodes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence of 9 words—very concise. However, it could be structured to front-load essential info and separate key aspects. Still, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no explanation of return values. For a creation tool, vital info like whether it returns the created node ID is missing. Minimal parameters described; lacks context on error conditions or constraints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (all parameters have descriptions). Description adds no additional meaning beyond 'with headers, rows, and proper spacing'—it does not clarify how 'brandColor' or 'parentId' affect the table, nor the format of 'rows' data.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Create a data table with headers, rows, and proper spacing,' which clearly identifies the tool's purpose. It uses a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('data table'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'create_frame' or 'create_card_grid'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Missing context on prerequisites, such as required parent container or acceptable data formats. Lacks explicit exclusions or comparisons to sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.