Skip to main content
Glama
lama-assaf

conductor-figma

by lama-assaf

create_smart_component

Create design-intelligent Figma components with auto-layout, padding, and sizing. Uses default component intelligence for consistent UI elements.

Instructions

Create a design-intelligent component with proper auto-layout, padding, and sizing. Uses component intelligence defaults.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeYesComponent type: button, input, card, avatar, badge, chip, switch, checkbox, radio, toast, tooltip, modal, dropdown, tabs, table, progress, skeleton, divider
variantNoVariant: default, sm, lg, icon, compact, spacious, pill, thin
labelNoText label for the component
brandColorNoBrand/accent color hex
modeNoColor mode (default: dark)
parentIdNoParent node ID
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the creation action, such as whether it modifies existing nodes, requires permissions, or has side effects. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the main purpose. No unnecessary words; concise and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks explanation of what 'design-intelligent' means, what defaults are used, and what the output looks like. With 6 parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete for an agent to fully understand tool behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents each parameter. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create) and the resource (design-intelligent component) with specific features (auto-layout, padding, sizing). However, it does not explicitly distinguish this tool from similar siblings like 'create_component' or 'create_component_set', lacking differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to choose 'create_smart_component' over 'create_component'. No prerequisites or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lama-assaf/conductor-figma'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server