batch_lock
Lock or unlock multiple Figma nodes by providing a list of node IDs and the desired lock state.
Instructions
Lock/unlock multiple nodes.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeIds | Yes | Target nodes | |
| locked | Yes | Lock state |
Lock or unlock multiple Figma nodes by providing a list of node IDs and the desired lock state.
Lock/unlock multiple nodes.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeIds | Yes | Target nodes | |
| locked | Yes | Lock state |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only states the action without disclosing behavioral traits like atomicity, side effects, or return values. For a batch operation, more transparency is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single concise sentence with no fluff. However, it could be expanded to include more useful context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has 2 required params and no output schema. The description lacks details on return values, error handling, or batch behavior (e.g., atomicity), especially important given the lack of annotations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions ('Target nodes', 'Lock state'). The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Lock/unlock' and the resource 'multiple nodes', distinguishing it from the sibling 'lock_node' which operates on a single node.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'lock_node' for single nodes. No context about prerequisites or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lama-assaf/conductor-figma'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server