set_wifi_ssid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states that the SSID is modified but gives no indication of side effects, radio band behavior, persistence, or whether clients will be disconnected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very brief and lacks any structured detail beyond a single phrase. It is not verbose, but it is so minimal that it provides little value over the tool name itself.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with two parameters and an output schema, this description is inadequate. It does not clarify the radio parameter, the effects of changing the SSID, or what the output represents, making it insufficient for safe and correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'ssid' or 'radio' parameters. The meaning of 'radio' and its default '2g' are left entirely to the schema, which lacks descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '修改 Wi-Fi SSID' clearly identifies the action (modify) and resource (Wi-Fi SSID), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like set_wifi_password or toggle_wifi. It is specific and unambiguous, though it does not elaborate on the meaning or scope beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description is only a verb phrase with no context, prerequisites, exclusions, or mention of related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.