get_ipv6_line_detailRetrieve IPv6 WAN line details from an iKuai router to inspect connection status, addressing, and interface parameters for network monitoring or troubleshooting.
获取 IPv6 线路详情
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so safety is covered. Beyond that the description adds nothing - no scope, no auth or permission notes, no indication of what 'line' encompasses.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single short phrase with no padding, but it is under-specified rather than truly concise - brevity here comes at the cost of disambiguation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists so return values need not be described, but for a tool sitting among several IPv6 getters the description does not supply enough to select it correctly or know what it covers.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to explain; baseline 4 applies. Schema description coverage is 100% but the schema is empty.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a verb ('获取'/'Get') and resource ('IPv6 线路详情'/'IPv6 line detail'), but 'line detail' is vague and does not distinguish it from close siblings like get_ipv6_config, get_ipv6_wan_config, get_ipv6_lan_config, or get_line_monitoring. An agent cannot tell from the text which IPv6-related data this returns.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of the many sibling tools it overlaps with. The agent is left to infer selection purely from the name.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.