Delete Vlan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it discloses nothing beyond the name. It does not state that the operation is irreversible, whether active traffic on the VLAN is disrupted, what happens if the VLAN is referenced by other config, or any permission requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this reflects under-specification rather than disciplined conciseness. There is no waste, but also essentially no content, so brevity earns no credit here.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation tool with no annotations, a required undocumented parameter, and configuration-modifying impact, the description is completely inadequate. An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, but every other aspect of correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single parameter vlan_id, and the description adds no clarification of its format, source, or valid range. Only the resource noun "VLAN" loosely implies what vlan_id refers to, which is marginal compensation for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"删除 VLAN" (Delete VLAN) merely restates the tool name and title "Delete Vlan" with no added specificity. It provides no scope information (which VLAN, whether wireless or wired) and does nothing to distinguish it from the many other delete_* siblings such as delete_ip_speed_limit or delete_dhcp_static_binding.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives like list_vlan_configs (to find the VLAN) or list_wireless_vlans. The agent is left to infer everything about invocation context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.