Delete Domain Blacklist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it discloses nothing: not that this is a destructive/irreversible removal, not whether confirmation or elevated permissions are required, not what happens to traffic for the removed domain, and not that rule_id must come from an existing listing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but this is under-specification rather than conciseness — one six-word phrase that duplicates the title and front-loads no actionable information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and an output schema exists (so return values need not be explained), but for a destructive, zero-annotation operation the description omits the minimum an agent needs: what rule_id identifies, where to get it, and that the deletion is permanent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description never mentions rule_id, its type, its format, or where to obtain it. With a single required integer parameter and no schema text, the description should compensate and does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"删除禁止娱乐网站" restates the tool name rather than defining it: it does not say what a blacklist entry is keyed by, nor that it acts on a single rule. It does add a hint about the domain of the blacklist (banned entertainment sites), but an agent learns essentially nothing beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use, no when-not-to-use, and no pointer to the obvious companion tools list_domain_blacklist (to obtain rule_id) or add_domain_blacklist. The agent must infer the whole workflow from the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.