delete_domain_blacklist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits. It does not mention whether the deletion is permanent, whether confirmation is needed, or what consequences occur. The description simply repeats the action without adding useful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than good conciseness. It omits essential information about the tool's scope and parameters, so the single sentence does not 'earn its place' as a complete explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete operation with one parameter and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the relationship to domain blacklisting, what the deletion affects, or any expected return values. An output schema exists but the description does not leverage it or add complementary context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention the rule_id parameter at all. It fails to clarify what rule_id refers to, how to find it, or its significance, leaving the sole parameter semantically unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says '删除禁止娱乐网站' (Delete prohibited entertainment websites), which specifies a verb and a resource, but the resource is misleadingly specific. The tool name indicates it deletes domain blacklist entries generally, not just entertainment websites. It does not distinguish from similar tools like delete_url_blacklist, and the narrowed wording creates confusion about the actual scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no indication of how to obtain the required rule_id. It merely states a single action without any contextual direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.