delete_mac_speed_limit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It only says 'delete', which implies a destructive action, but it does not mention irreversibility, impact on active rules, or any required permissions. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (four Chinese characters), but this is under-specification rather than conciseness. It fails to provide any useful structure or elaborated meaning, essentially duplicating the tool name in another language.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple delete operation, the description still does not explain what rule_id refers to, what happens after deletion, or whether there are any side effects. The presence of an output schema is not leveraged, and the description remains inadequate for an agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter, rule_id, with no textual description (0% schema description coverage). The description does not mention rule_id or explain how to identify the MAC speed limit rule to delete. Since the description was expected to compensate for the missing parameter details, this is a critical gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '删除 MAC 限速' translates directly to 'Delete MAC speed limit', which is a tautological restatement of the tool name. It does not add any distinguishing information beyond what the name already conveys, nor does it differentiate the tool from similar siblings like delete_ip_speed_limit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when this tool should be used versus alternatives. The description does not mention any context, prerequisites, or exclusions. An agent would have no basis for selecting this tool over related delete operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.