add_ip_speed_limit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It only states the basic add operation without mentioning effects such as whether it overwrites existing rules, requires specific permissions, or has any side effects. This is a significant omission for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely terse (a single short phrase), but this is under-specification rather than appropriate conciseness. It omits essential context, making it insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's usage. Every word is functional, but the content is too sparse to earn a higher score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (5 parameters, output schema, many sibling tools), the description is completely inadequate. It does not explain the tool's role within the broader API, the meaning of its parameters, or expected behavior, leaving an agent to guess.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the description does not explain any of the five parameters (ip_addr, upload_kbps, download_kbps, etc.). The description adds no meaning beyond the schema's bare parameter names and types, failing to compensate for the lack of documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '添加 IP 限速' (Add IP speed limit) clearly states the action (add) and the resource (IP speed limit), making the tool's purpose understandable. It distinguishes itself from siblings like add_mac_speed_limit by specifying IP, but this distinction is already inherent in the tool name, so the description adds little beyond a direct translation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are closely related sibling tools (add_mac_speed_limit, delete_ip_speed_limit, list_ip_speed_limits) that could benefit from usage context, but none is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.