get_security_advanced_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description aligns with the readOnlyHint annotation, confirming a safe read operation. No additional behavioral traits are disclosed, but due to the simple getter nature with zero parameters, the annotation suffices. The description adds no extra context beyond the action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, a single phrase that front-loads the action and object without waste. However, it is so terse that it reads more like a translation of the tool name than an explanatory description, losing an opportunity to add value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With zero parameters and an output schema available, the description's minimalism is acceptable. Yet it lacks any context about the nature of the security advanced settings or when to use them, which would help the agent differentiate this getter from many similar siblings. It is a minimum-viable description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics to explain. The baseline of 4 applies since the description is not burdened with parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '获取安全中心高级设置' translates to 'Get security center advanced settings.' It clearly states the action (get) and the resource (security center advanced settings), distinguishing it from siblings by its specific focus. However, it does not elaborate on what 'advanced settings' includes, so it is clear but not detailed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool or which alternatives might be more appropriate. The description is a bare statement without context, prerequisites, or comparison to related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.