Skip to main content
Glama

get_persona_profile

Read-only

Look up a buyer persona profile by job title before a sales call to understand communication preferences, an empathy map, and messaging angles.

Instructions

Look up who you're actually talking to before the call — what they care about at 7 AM, what they need before they say yes, and exactly how to open. Returns persona details including communication preferences, empathy map and messaging angles.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesJob title of the person you're meeting (e.g., "VP Engineering", "CTO", "Head of Sales")
industryNoTheir industry
verticalNoThe industry the user sells into (e.g., "fintech", "healthcare", "defense"). Infer from conversation context — the user's product description, company name, or the companies they're asking about. If unclear, ask.
targetRoleNoThe buyer role being evaluated (e.g., "CFO", "CTO", "VP Sales"). Infer from context — often explicit in the user's question. If not mentioned, default to the most senior relevant role for their vertical.
companySizeNoTheir company size range
productDescriptionNoA brief description of what the user's product does and who it's for. Infer this from the conversation if the user has already described their product. If the user hasn't mentioned their product yet, ask them: "What does your product do, and who do you sell to?" before calling this tool.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.4.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description usefully adds what the response contains (communication preferences, empathy map, messaging angles), which is real context beyond the annotations, though it omits anything on data freshness or sourcing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that leads with the purpose and then the returned value. Slightly salesy phrasing ("before they say yes", "7 AM") costs a little precision but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, and the description compensates by naming the return contents. For a read-only, open-world lookup with full parameter documentation, an agent has enough to call it correctly; only sibling routing is under-specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so every parameter including the required title and inference guidance for vertical/targetRole/productDescription is fully documented in the schema. The description adds nothing parameter-specific, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (look up) and resource (persona profile), and names the returned content: communication preferences, empathy map, messaging angles. It does not distinguish itself from adjacent siblings like simulate_buyer_persona or get_icp_profile, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Before the call" implies the usage moment, giving implicit context for when to invoke it. However, there is no explicit when-not guidance and no mention of how it relates to alternatives such as simulate_buyer_persona, leaving the routing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.