Andru
Related Servers
Alternatives to Andru
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSales intelligence for DACH & EU SMEs — lead scoring, ICP fit, CRM enrichment & writeback.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGTM signal intelligence suite for AI agents. Six tools: hiring signals, tech stack detection, company-to-LinkedIn resolution, ICP scoring, job board scanning, and a combined signals aggregator. Built for outbound sales workflows.21140 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceBattle cards and scored practice calls against an AI buyer, for any company vs any competitor. From Battlecard: score every call, rehearse every gap.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover companies showing buying signals, enrich them with public homepage data, score them against custom rules, and draft review-ready briefs.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables B2B prospecting from natural language: detect buying signals, score leads against ICP, enrich decision-makers, and draft personalized outreach messages via Claude.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive B2B intelligence server providing over 48 tools for lead generation, company research, and sales automation via the Model Context Protocol. It enables AI-powered prospect discovery, enrichment, and competitive analysis through seamless integrations with Make.com, Claude Desktop, and Apify.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 34 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but the set contains several overlapping assessment tools (get_icp_fit_score, batch_fit_score, classify_opportunity, get_disqualification_signals, get_evaluation_criteria, assess_company_readiness) and several memory/context tools (get_founder_context, get_revenue_memory, get_memory_history). The descriptions cross-reference alternatives well, but with 34 tools an agent can still plausibly misselect among the fit/scoring and memory families.
Most names are snake_case and follow a verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, generate_, assess_, classify_). A few deviations exist, such as whoami, quote, signup_start/verify/status, and batch_fit_score, but they are grouped and readable rather than chaotic.
The set is large at 34 tools, above the practical range for a single MCP surface even for a broad sales/revenue platform. Many tools are distinct, but the surface would benefit from consolidation or splitting into narrower modules.
Coverage is broad across ICP, prospecting, meeting prep, scoring, memory, portfolio, assets, billing, and fundraising. However, lifecycle management is thin: there is no clear listing or management of saved assets/account plans/prospects, and no update/delete operations for most saved objects beyond keeping memory history.