Skip to main content
Glama
emmron
by emmron

mcp__gemini__secaudit_quantum

Conduct advanced security audits, predict vulnerabilities, ensure compliance with standards, and assess quantum-readiness for code or systems with comprehensive threat modeling.

Instructions

Advanced security audit with vulnerability prediction, compliance checking, and quantum-readiness assessment

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
audit_depthNoAudit depthcomprehensive
compliance_standardsNoCompliance standards
include_quantumNoInclude quantum vulnerability assessment
targetYesCode/system to audit
threat_modelingNoEnable threat modeling

Implementation Reference

  • The primary handler function implementing the tool logic: performs advanced security audit with vulnerability prediction, compliance checking against standards like OWASP/SOC2, quantum-readiness assessment, threat modeling, executive reporting, and stores results.
        handler: async (args) => {
          const { target, audit_depth = 'comprehensive', compliance_standards = ['OWASP', 'SOC2'], include_quantum = true, threat_modeling = true } = args;
          validateString(target, 'target');
          
          const timer = performanceMonitor.startTimer('secaudit_quantum');
          
          const standards = Array.isArray(compliance_standards) ? compliance_standards : [compliance_standards];
          
          // Core security audit
          const auditPrompt = `Perform ${audit_depth} security audit:
    
    Target: ${target}
    
    **Compliance Standards**: ${standards.join(', ')}
    
    Conduct thorough security analysis:
    
    1. **Vulnerability Assessment**
       - Input validation vulnerabilities
       - Authentication/authorization flaws
       - Injection attack vectors
       - Data exposure risks
       - Configuration security issues
    
    2. **Security Architecture Review**
       - Security pattern implementation
       - Defense-in-depth analysis
       - Attack surface assessment
       - Trust boundary evaluation
    
    3. **Compliance Evaluation**
       - ${standards.join(' compliance\n   - ')} compliance
       - Regulatory requirement gaps
       - Policy adherence assessment
    
    4. **Risk Scoring**
       - Vulnerability severity (CVSS)
       - Exploit probability
       - Business impact assessment
       - Risk prioritization matrix
    
    ${threat_modeling ? `5. **Threat Modeling**
       - Attack tree analysis
       - Threat actor profiling
       - Attack vector identification
       - Mitigation effectiveness` : ''}
    
    Provide specific findings with:
    - CVE references where applicable
    - Proof-of-concept examples
    - Remediation steps with code examples
    - Timeline for fixes (Critical/High/Medium/Low)`;
    
          const coreAudit = await aiClient.call(auditPrompt, 'security', { 
            complexity: 'complex',
            maxTokens: 4000 
          });
          
          let result = `🔒 **Quantum Security Audit** (${audit_depth})
    
    **Compliance**: ${standards.join(', ')}
    **Quantum Analysis**: ${include_quantum ? 'Enabled' : 'Disabled'}
    **Threat Modeling**: ${threat_modeling ? 'Enabled' : 'Disabled'}
    
    ${coreAudit}`;
    
          // Quantum vulnerability assessment
          if (include_quantum) {
            const quantumPrompt = `Assess quantum computing security implications:
    
    Target: ${target}
    
    Analyze:
    1. **Quantum Vulnerability Assessment**
       - Current cryptographic implementations
       - Quantum-vulnerable algorithms (RSA, ECDSA, DSA)
       - Post-quantum readiness score
    
    2. **Cryptographic Inventory**
       - Encryption algorithms in use
       - Key management practices
       - Certificate authority dependencies
       - Random number generation
    
    3. **Quantum-Safe Migration Plan**
       - NIST post-quantum standards compliance
       - Migration timeline and priorities
       - Hybrid transition strategies
       - Cost-benefit analysis
    
    4. **Future-Proofing Recommendations**
       - Quantum-resistant algorithms (CRYSTALS-Kyber, SPHINCS+, FALCON)
       - Implementation roadmap
       - Backward compatibility considerations
       - Performance impact assessment
    
    Provide specific recommendations for quantum readiness.`;
    
            const quantumAnalysis = await aiClient.call(quantumPrompt, 'security');
            
            result += `
    
    ---
    
    🔮 **Quantum Vulnerability Analysis**
    
    ${quantumAnalysis}`;
          }
    
          // Generate executive security report
          const executivePrompt = `Create executive security summary:
    
    Based on security audit findings:
    ${coreAudit}
    
    ${include_quantum ? `Quantum Analysis: ${quantumAnalysis}` : ''}
    
    Provide:
    1. **Executive Summary**
       - Overall security posture (1-10 scale)
       - Critical risk summary
       - Immediate action items
    
    2. **Business Impact Analysis**
       - Financial risk assessment
       - Compliance exposure
       - Reputation impact
       - Operational disruption potential
    
    3. **Investment Priorities**
       - Security improvement ROI
       - Resource allocation recommendations
       - Timeline for critical fixes
       - Budget requirements
    
    4. **Strategic Recommendations**
       - Long-term security roadmap
       - Technology modernization needs
       - Team capability requirements
       - Governance improvements
    
    Format for C-suite consumption with clear business language.`;
    
          const executiveSummary = await aiClient.call(executivePrompt, 'analysis');
          
          result += `
    
    ---
    
    📊 **Executive Security Report**
    
    ${executiveSummary}`;
    
          // Save audit results
          const auditData = {
            id: Date.now().toString(),
            target,
            audit_depth,
            compliance_standards: standards,
            include_quantum,
            threat_modeling,
            timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
            findings: coreAudit.substring(0, 1000) // Store summary only
          };
          
          const storageData = await storage.read('security_audits');
          if (!storageData.audits) storageData.audits = [];
          storageData.audits.push(auditData);
          
          // Keep only last 50 audits
          if (storageData.audits.length > 50) {
            storageData.audits = storageData.audits.slice(-50);
          }
          
          await storage.write('security_audits', storageData);
          
          result += `
    
    **Audit ID**: ${auditData.id} (saved for compliance tracking)`;
          
          timer.end();
          return result;
        }
  • Input schema defining parameters: target (required), audit_depth, compliance_standards, include_quantum, threat_modeling.
    parameters: {
      target: { type: 'string', description: 'Code/system to audit', required: true },
      audit_depth: { type: 'string', description: 'Audit depth', default: 'comprehensive' },
      compliance_standards: { type: 'array', description: 'Compliance standards', default: ['OWASP', 'SOC2'] },
      include_quantum: { type: 'boolean', description: 'Include quantum vulnerability assessment', default: true },
      threat_modeling: { type: 'boolean', description: 'Enable threat modeling', default: true }
  • Registration block in ToolRegistry where enhancedTools module (containing this tool) is registered via registerToolsFromModule calls for multiple tool modules.
    this.registerToolsFromModule(codeTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(analysisTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(enhancedTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(businessTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(licenseTools);
  • The registerTool method used to register individual tools from modules, converting parameters to JSON schema.
    registerTool(name, description, parameters, handler) {
      this.tools.set(name, {
        name,
        description,
        inputSchema: {
          $schema: "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
          type: 'object',
          properties: this.convertParametersToSchema(parameters),
          required: Object.keys(parameters).filter(key => parameters[key].required)
        },
        handler
      });
  • convertParametersToSchema helper that transforms the parameters object into proper JSON schema for MCP compliance.
    convertParametersToSchema(parameters) {
      const properties = {};
      for (const [key, param] of Object.entries(parameters)) {
        properties[key] = {
          type: param.type,
          description: param.description
        };
        
        // Handle array types properly
        if (param.type === 'array') {
          properties[key].items = { type: 'string' };
        }
        
        // Handle object types properly  
        if (param.type === 'object') {
          properties[key].additionalProperties = true;
        }
        
        // Add default if present
        if (param.default !== undefined) {
          properties[key].default = param.default;
        }
      }
      return properties;
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions the tool performs 'audit' functions but doesn't describe what the audit entails operationally - whether it's read-only or makes changes, what permissions are required, how long it takes, what format results come in, or any rate limits. For a complex security audit tool with 5 parameters, this is inadequate behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise - a single sentence that efficiently lists the three main functions. Every word earns its place, and it's front-loaded with the core purpose. There's zero waste or redundancy in this compact description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex security audit tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the audit produces, how results are returned, what the scope limitations are, or any prerequisites. The description covers the 'what' but not the 'how' or 'what results to expect', leaving significant gaps for an agent trying to use this tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 5 parameters with basic descriptions. The tool description doesn't add any parameter-specific information beyond what's in the schema. It mentions the three audit functions which map to some parameters (compliance_standards, include_quantum, threat_modeling) but doesn't provide additional context about how these parameters interact or affect the audit process.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose as an 'Advanced security audit' with three specific functions: vulnerability prediction, compliance checking, and quantum-readiness assessment. It uses specific verbs and resources, but doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'analyze_codebase' or 'codereview_expert' which might also analyze code/security aspects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools that might overlap in security/code analysis (e.g., 'analyze_codebase', 'codereview_expert', 'precommit_guardian'), there's no indication of when this specialized audit tool is preferred or what distinguishes it from those alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/emmron/gemini-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server