Skip to main content
Glama
emmron
by emmron

mcp__gemini__performance_predictor

Predict system performance metrics like response time and throughput across load scenarios, enabling data-driven optimizations and capacity planning for 12-month horizons.

Instructions

AI-powered performance prediction and optimization recommendations with capacity planning

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
load_scenariosNoLoad scenarios to predict
metricsNoPerformance metrics to predict
prediction_horizonNoPrediction timeframe12 months
systemYesSystem or code to analyze

Implementation Reference

  • The primary handler function implementing the tool's logic. It takes system details and scenarios, crafts detailed AI prompts for performance prediction and optimization recommendations, calls the AI client twice, and formats a comprehensive response.
        handler: async (args) => {
          const { system, load_scenarios = ['current', '2x', '10x'], metrics = ['response_time', 'throughput', 'resource_usage'], prediction_horizon = '12 months' } = args;
          validateString(system, 'system');
          
          const timer = performanceMonitor.startTimer('performance_predictor');
          
          const predictionPrompt = `Create AI-powered performance prediction model:
    
    **System**: ${system}
    **Load Scenarios**: ${load_scenarios.join(', ')}
    **Metrics**: ${metrics.join(', ')}
    **Prediction Horizon**: ${prediction_horizon}
    
    Analyze and predict:
    
    1. **Current Performance Baseline**
       - Current performance characteristics
       - Resource utilization patterns
       - Bottleneck identification
       - Scalability limits
    
    2. **Performance Predictions by Load**
       ${load_scenarios.map(scenario => `- **${scenario} Load**: Predicted performance metrics and breaking points`).join('\n   ')}
    
    3. **Capacity Planning**
       - Resource requirements for each scenario
       - Infrastructure scaling recommendations
       - Cost implications of scaling
       - Optimal scaling thresholds
    
    4. **Performance Optimization Roadmap**
       - Priority optimization opportunities
       - Expected performance gains
       - Implementation effort vs impact
       - Monitoring and alerting strategy
    
    5. **Predictive Modeling**
       - Performance degradation patterns
       - Early warning indicators
       - Automated scaling triggers
       - Capacity forecasting
    
    Provide specific numbers, thresholds, and actionable recommendations.`;
    
          const performancePrediction = await aiClient.call(predictionPrompt, 'analysis', { 
            complexity: 'complex',
            maxTokens: 4000 
          });
          
          // Generate optimization recommendations
          const optimizationPrompt = `Based on performance predictions, create optimization strategy:
    
    ${performancePrediction}
    
    Provide:
    1. **Immediate Optimizations** (0-3 months)
       - Quick wins with high impact
       - Low-effort improvements
       - Performance monitoring setup
    
    2. **Medium-term Improvements** (3-12 months)
       - Architectural optimizations
       - Technology upgrades
       - Process improvements
    
    3. **Long-term Strategic Changes** (12+ months)
       - Platform modernization
       - Scalability architecture
       - Future-proofing initiatives
    
    4. **Implementation Roadmap**
       - Prioritized action plan
       - Resource requirements
       - Success metrics
       - Risk mitigation
    
    Include cost-benefit analysis for each optimization.`;
    
          const optimizationStrategy = await aiClient.call(optimizationPrompt, 'analysis');
          
          timer.end();
          
          return `🚀 **Performance Prediction Model** (${prediction_horizon})
    
    **System**: ${system}
    **Load Scenarios**: ${load_scenarios.join(', ')}
    **Metrics**: ${metrics.join(', ')}
    
    ---
    
    📊 **Performance Predictions**
    
    ${performancePrediction}
    
    ---
    
    âš¡ **Optimization Strategy**
    
    ${optimizationStrategy}`;
        }
  • Input schema defining the parameters for the performance predictor tool, including required system description and optional load scenarios, metrics, and prediction horizon.
    parameters: {
      system: { type: 'string', description: 'System or code to analyze', required: true },
      load_scenarios: { type: 'array', description: 'Load scenarios to predict', default: ['current', '2x', '10x'] },
      metrics: { type: 'array', description: 'Performance metrics to predict', default: ['response_time', 'throughput', 'resource_usage'] },
      prediction_horizon: { type: 'string', description: 'Prediction timeframe', default: '12 months' }
  • Generic registration function used to register all tools from the businessTools module, including 'mcp__gemini__performance_predictor', by calling registerTool for each entry.
    registerToolsFromModule(toolsModule) {
      Object.entries(toolsModule).forEach(([name, tool]) => {
        this.registerTool(name, tool.description, tool.parameters, tool.handler);
      });
    }
  • Specific call to register the businessTools module containing the 'mcp__gemini__performance_predictor' tool.
    this.registerToolsFromModule(businessTools);
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but offers minimal behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'AI-powered' and 'optimization recommendations', hinting at analysis and suggestions, but doesn't specify output format, whether it's read-only or has side effects, accuracy limitations, or computational requirements. This is inadequate for a prediction tool with potential impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient phrase that front-loads key information ('AI-powered performance prediction and optimization recommendations with capacity planning'). It wastes no words and directly communicates the core function without unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of performance prediction and no annotations or output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the tool returns (e.g., predictions, recommendations, reports), how results are formatted, or any behavioral constraints. For a tool with 4 parameters and potential decision-making impact, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, providing baseline documentation for all 4 parameters. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema's descriptions of 'load_scenarios', 'metrics', 'prediction_horizon', and 'system'. It doesn't explain relationships between parameters or provide examples, so it meets but doesn't exceed the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool performs 'AI-powered performance prediction and optimization recommendations with capacity planning', which specifies the action (prediction/optimization) and resource (performance/capacity). It distinguishes from most siblings focused on code analysis, chat, or project management, though it doesn't explicitly differentiate from similar analysis tools like 'analyze_codebase' or 'system_status'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description doesn't mention prerequisites, scenarios where it's appropriate, or when to choose other tools like 'analyze_codebase' for code performance or 'system_status' for current metrics. Usage is implied through the tool's name and description but not explicitly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/emmron/gemini-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server